Site icon automotivemogul

Reusability report: Exploring the transferability of self-supervised learning models from single-cell to spatial transcriptomics

Reusability report: Exploring the transferability of self-supervised learning models from single-cell to spatial transcriptomics
  • Regev, A. et al. The Human Cell Atlas. eLife (2017).

  • Rood, J. E., Maartens, A., Hupalowska, A., Teichmann, S. A. & Regev, A. Impact of the Human Cell Atlas on medicine. Nat. Med. 28, 2486–2496 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressan, D., Battistoni, G. & Hannon, G. J. The dawn of spatial omics. Science (2023).

  • Wang, L. et al. Molecular and cellular dynamics of the developing human neocortex. Nature (2025).

  • Sun, E. D. et al. Spatial transcriptomic clocks reveal cell proximity effects in brain ageing. Nature 638, 160–171 (2024).

  • Moses, L. & Pachter, L. Museum of spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 19, 534–546 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegle, O., Teichmann, S. A. & Marioni, J. C. Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 133–145 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proc. 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) 4171–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019).

  • He, K. et al. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 16000–16009 (IEEE, 2022).

  • Radford, A. et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In Proc. 38th International Conference on Machine Learning 8748–8763 (PMLR, 2021).

  • Cui, H. et al. scGPT: toward building a foundation model for single-cell multi-omics using generative AI. Nat. Methods 21, 1470–1480 (2024).

  • Hao, M. et al. Large-scale foundation model on single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 21, 1481–1491 (2024).

  • Yang, F. et al. scBERT as a large-scale pretrained deep language model for cell type annotation of single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 852–866 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, T., Bahrami, M., Xia, Y., Fischer, D. S. & Theis, F. J. Delineating the effective use of self-supervised learning in single-cell genomics. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 68–78 (2024).

  • Fischer, F. et al. scTab: scaling cross-tissue single-cell annotation models. Nat. Commun.15, 6611 (2024).

  • Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M. & Hinton, G. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In Proc. 37th International Conference on Machine Learning 1597–1607 (PMLR, 2020).

  • Zbontar, J., Jing, L., Misra, I., LeCun, Y. & Deny, S. Barlow Twins: self-supervised learning via redundancy reduction. In Proc. 38th International Conference on Machine Learning 12310–12320 (PMLR, 2021).

  • Marx, V. Method of the year: spatially resolved transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 18, 9–14 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstens, J. L. et al. Spatial multiplexing and omics. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 4, 54 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heumos, L. et al. Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 550–572 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergen, C. et al. Consensus prediction of cell type labels in single-cell data with popV. Nat. Genet. 56, 2731–2738 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zormpas, E., Queen, R., Comber, A. & Cockell, S. J. Mapping the transcriptome: realizing the full potential of spatial data analysis. Cell 186, 5677–5689 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Z. et al. Benchmarking spatial clustering methods with spatially resolved transcriptomics data. Nat. Methods 21, 712–722 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickels, R. R. et al. Highly sensitive spatial transcriptomics at near-cellular resolution with Slide-seqV2. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 313–319 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janesick, A. et al. High resolution mapping of the tumor microenvironment using integrated single-cell, spatial and in situ analysis. Nat. Commun. 14, 8353 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. L. et al. High-resolution Slide-seqV2 spatial transcriptomics enables discovery of disease-specific cell neighborhoods and pathways. iScience 25, 104097 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, K. & Zhang, S. Deciphering spatial domains from spatially resolved transcriptomics with an adaptive graph attention auto-encoder. Nat. Commun. 13, 1739 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Y. et al. Spatially informed clustering, integration, and deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics with GraphST. Nat. Commun. 14, 1155 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M. et al. Molecularly defined and spatially resolved cell atlas of the whole mouse brain. Nature 624, 343–354 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B. et al. A spatiotemporal atlas of cholestatic injury and repair in mice. Nat. Genet. 56, 938–952 (2024).

  • Chen, X. et al. Whole-cortex in situ sequencing reveals input-dependent area identity. Nature (2024).

  • Greenwald, A. C. et al. Integrative spatial analysis reveals a multi-layered organization of glioblastoma. Cell 187, 2485–2501 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, C.-H. G. et al. Spatial genomic, biochemical and cellular mechanisms underlying meningioma heterogeneity and evolution. Nat. Genet. 56, 1121–1133 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atta, L. & Fan, J. Computational challenges and opportunities in spatially resolved transcriptomic data analysis. Nat. Commun. 12, 5283 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Szałata, A. et al. Transformers in single-cell omics: a review and new perspectives. Nat. Methods 21, 1430–1443 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. et al. Spatial transcriptomics: technologies, applications and experimental considerations. Genomics 115, 110671 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S., Lubeck, E., Zhou, W. & Cai, L. In situ transcription profiling of single cells reveals spatial organization of cells in the mouse hippocampus. Neuron 92, 342–357 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. et al. Three-dimensional intact-tissue sequencing of single-cell transcriptional states. Science 361, eaat5691 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, F. et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancalani, T. et al. Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with Tangram. Nat. Methods 18, 1352–1362 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benchmarking spatial and single-cell transcriptomics integration methods. Nat. Methods (2022).

  • Li, B. et al. Benchmarking spatial and single-cell transcriptomics integration methods for transcript distribution prediction and cell type deconvolution. Nat. Methods 19, 662–670 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, H., Walker, B. L., Cang, Z. & Nie, Q. Identifying multicellular spatiotemporal organization of cells with SpaceFlow. Nat. Commun. 13, 4076 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varrone, M., Tavernari, D., Santamaria-Martínez, A., Walsh, L. A. & Ciriello, G. CellCharter reveals spatial cell niches associated with tissue remodeling and cell plasticity. Nat. Genet. 56, 74–84 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, V. et al. BANKSY unifies cell typing and tissue domain segmentation for scalable spatial omics data analysis. Nat. Genet. 56, 431–441 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y. & Zhou, X. Accurate and efficient integrative reference-informed spatial domain detection for spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 21, 1231–1244 (2024).

  • Boiarsky, R. et al. Deeper evaluation of a single-cell foundation model. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 1443–1446 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, T. & Bahrami, M. theislab/ssl_in_scg. GitHub (2025).

  • Richter, T. TillR/sc_pretrained. Hugging Face (2024).

  • Yoshida, M. et al. Local and systemic responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adults. Nature 602, 321–327 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabula Sapiens Consortium et al. The Tabula Sapiens: a multiple-organ, single-cell transcriptomic atlas of humans. Science 376, eabl4896 (2022).

  • Siletti, K. et al. Transcriptomic diversity of cell types across the adult human brain. Science 382, eadd7046 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siletti, K. et al. Human Brain Cell Atlas v1.0. CELLxGENE cellxgene.cziscience.com/e/9f499d32-400d-4c42-ac9a-fb1481844fee.cxg (2023).

  • Jorstad, N. L. et al. Comparative transcriptomics reveals human-specific cortical features. Science 382, eade9516 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakken, T. E. et al. Comparative transcriptomics reveals human-specific cortical features. CELLxGENE cellxgene.cziscience.com/e/2bdd3a2c-2ff4-4314-adf3-8a06b797a33a.cxg (2023).

  • Wang, L. et al. Molecular and cellular dynamics of the developing human neocortex at single-cell resolution. CELLxGENE (2025).

  • Janesick, A. et al. High resolution mapping of the tumor microenvironment using integrated single-cell, spatial and in situ analysis. 10x Genomics (2023).

  • Marshall, J. L. et al. High resolution Slide-seqV2 spatial transcriptomics enables discovery of disease-specific cell neighborhoods and pathways. CELLxGENE (2022).

  • Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. (2018).

  • Biancalani, T., Scalia, G., Lu, Z., Gaddam, S. & Hupalowska, A. Tangram 0.4.0 documentation. TANGRAM (2021).

  • Biancalani, T. et al. broadinstitute/Tangram/tree/master. GitHub (2023).

  • Han, C. CSHCY/Reusability_SSL_in_SCG: release of the SSLBench. Zenodo (2025).

  • Becht, E. et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 38–44 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Exit mobile version